Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Christopher Mathieu

Christopher Mathieu

Docent

Christopher Mathieu

The Moral Life of the Party : Moral Argumentation and the Creation of Meaning in the Europe Policy Debates of the Christian and Left-Socialist Parties in Denmark and Sweden 1990-1996

Författare

  • Christopher Mathieu

Summary, in English

This thesis analyzes moral argumentation and meaning creation in the process of programmatic policy formulation in the Christian People's Party and Socialist People's Party in Denmark, and the Christian Democratic Party and Left Party in Sweden, focusing specifically on their policy deliberations about the European Community and the European Union from 1990-1996. The primary emphasis is not on policy outcomes per se, but rather on how moral argumentation as a form of policy deliberation is created and sustained in political parties. Contrary to contentions from two traditions skeptical towards the centrality of moral argumentation in the formulation of party policy, the "economistic"/rational choice, respective basic value relativism traditions, it is found that policy deliberation is carried out primarily in terms of substantive moral arguments rather than utility maximization, aggregating or mere procedural agreement. Similar mechanisms in each of the four parties studied create settings in which moral argumentation is carried out and sustained. In party settings moral argumentation is facilitated by the "objectification" of the normative - via the group process of evaluating and ranking current normative contentions in terms of previously evaluated and ranked normative contentions. In this way moral contentions are given varying degrees of support from a common legitimating authority - the party - and a series of collectively affirmed positions and "traditions" exist to refer to. Surreptitiously, through moral argumentation the meaning of the objects of political deliberation is created by the way they are related to central values and goals of the party. It is subsequently through reference to these socially established meanings that policy debates are carried out. Ultimately it is concluded that the norm of moral argumentation is founded upon the belief among party members, and actual operation, of these parties as moral communities.

Avdelning/ar

  • Sociologi

Publiceringsår

1999

Språk

Engelska

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Lund Dissertations in Sociology

Issue

30

Dokumenttyp

Doktorsavhandling

Förlag

Department of Sociology, Lund University

Ämne

  • Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Nyckelord

  • policy formulation
  • European Union
  • political parties (Scandinavian)
  • moral community
  • Sociology
  • Sociologi

Aktiv

Published

Handledare

  • [unknown] [unknown]

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1102-4712
  • ISBN: 91-89078-96-9
  • ISRN: LUSADG/SASO--99/1126--SE

Försvarsdatum

4 december 1999

Försvarstid

10:15

Försvarsplats

Edens Hörsal, Lund

Opponent

  • Per Olof Olofsson