Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Porträtt David Brehm Sausdal. Foto: Johan Persson.

David Sausdal

Docent | Biträdande universitetslektor

Porträtt David Brehm Sausdal. Foto: Johan Persson.

Overponderabilia : Overcoming overthinking when studying “ourselves”

Författare

  • Kasper Tang Vangkilde
  • David Brehm Sausdal

Summary, in English

This article discusses a key methodological difficulty in conducting qualitative research close to home: the issue of overthinking. Whereas MALINOWSKI's concern regarding imponderabilia, i.e., the risk of not thinking about the subtle phenomena of everyday life, has long haunted ethnographers and qualitative researchers, not least those working "at home," we highlight an issue of overponderabilia, i.e., the risk of overthinking seemingly familiar statements and practices of the people studied. How do we, as qualitative researchers, study very well-known phenomena such as science, bureaucracy, management etc. without reading our own ideas and understandings into the deceptively familiar concepts and accounts of our research subjects? Pondering this issue is inevitably a central concern for the increasing number of qualitative researchers who study people who apparently talk, think and work in a way which is similar to their own. While previous answers or solutions to this issue first and foremost emphasize various means of reflexivity, this article presents the method of "mutual participatory observation" as a particular way of overcoming overthinking: a method which in situ invites our research subjects into our thinking. Thus, in the pursuit of an ever enhanced understanding, qualitative research becomes not so much a reflexive deciphering as an active debate; that is, a mutual induction of the differences between the qualitative researcher and the research subjects.

Publiceringsår

2016-05

Språk

Engelska

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung

Volym

17

Issue

2

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

The Institute for Qualitative Research and the Center for Digital Systems, Freie Universität Berlin

Ämne

  • Sociology

Nyckelord

  • Ethnography as debate
  • Imponderabilia
  • Mutual induction
  • Mutual participatory observation
  • Overponderabilia
  • Qualitative research at home
  • Reflexivity

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1438-5627